CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Omitting callign in exchange

To: CQ-Contest@CONTESTING.COM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Omitting callign in exchange
From: Georgek5kg@aol.com
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 11:31:55 EST
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
There were a few smarty-pants ops who were omitting their callsign in the  
exchange.  They were in violation of the rules, and should be  disqualified! 
 As the country song goes, they knew what they were a doin',  but what were 
they a thinkin'?
 
For them to omit their callsign was confusing, as it broke the rhythm of  
what I, and my logging software, was expecting to copy.
 
 
73, George, K5KG
 
 
 
George  Wagner, K5KG
Sarasota, FL  

 
In a message dated 11/9/2010 6:12:03 A.M. Canada Central Standard Ti,  
n0nb@n0nb.us writes:

Note  well that "Your Callsign" is a *required part of the exchange* as
stated in  rule 4.3.  Its ommission makes the exchange invalid, IMO.  So  
it's redundant, that doesn't matter, it's *required*.   



_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>