CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update

To: <sawyered@earthlink.net>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update
From: Guy Molinari <guy_molinari@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:48:10 +0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Because it is publicly available and does not necessarily provide an advantage 
for just the owning op?
 
> From: sawyered@earthlink.net
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 15:17:53 -0500
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update
> 
> It doesn't really matter to me since I never use them.contest or no contest,
> but what exactly is the difference between a personal skimmer located in
> Europe (for a W/VE contester) and a European Skimmer that displays all its
> info on the net. Aren't they both remote CW receivers that are showing
> callsigns and frequencies that can be read by the W/VE station? The CQ WW
> rules make it seem like one is way more advantageous than the other but I am
> failing to see why.
> 
> 
> 
> Ed N1UR
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
                                          
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>