Wow, quite a flap. Our little RBN group has no desire to be singled
out. VE7CC does indeed run a Skimmer-enabled node - IIRC you can
set/skimmer there and get both Skimmer and regular DXcluster spots. It
covers, I believe, all the Skimmers on the RBN that have published their
IP address (some cannot, and some prefer not to).
I think the CQWW rule should be modified slightly to add "and other,
similar *public* sources of Skimmer spots." This would permit
connecting to VE7CC, other aggregators of Skimmer spots, or individual
Skimmers - as Dave has pointed out, this should be permitted.
Connecting to the any public source of Skimmer spots only gets you
Skimmer *spots* - it does not get you the Skimmer display of an entire
swath of the band. Public Skimmers that are spotting only running
stations, and aggregators like the RBN that spot only running stations
on HF, should not be a concern, because they cannot be exploited by any
individual station to, for example, hear weak Europeans calling them on
160.
It seems to me that the ARRL anticipated this in their Skimmer rule,
which antedated the RBN. It has 2 key components (my interpretation) -
any remote Skimmer must be public, and it must not be controlled so as
to benefit its owner over others. Both of these tests are met by
connecting to the RBN, to VE7CC, or to any individual public Skimmer run
by someone else.
On the RBN reliability front - we now have a second server running at
n4zr.reversebeacon.net port 7000, and have offers of two more. The plan
is to use this additional capacity both to spread the load and to add
redundancy. Users will be able to connect to telnet.reversebeacon.net
port 7000 and will be assigned to one of the servers, either in a
round-robin configuration or in some more fail-safe arrangement, still
TBD. Stay tuned.
73, Pete, N4ZR
The World Contest Station Database, updated daily at www.conteststations.com
The Reverse Beacon Network at http://reversebeacon.net, blog at
reversebeacon.blogspot.com,
spots at telnet.reversebeacon.net, port 7000
On 11/23/2010 7:10 PM, K1TTT wrote:
> Ah, but that does not prohibit use of spotting networks, which are
> specifically allowed by:
>
> 4. Single Operator Assisted (All Band or
> Single Band): ... QSO alerting assistance is
> allowed (this includes, but is not limited to,
> packet, local or remote Skimmer and/or
> Skimmer-like technology, Internet). ...
>
> And does that not rely on receivers beyond the 500m circle? So, if I help a
> friend set up a receiving system and they put spots into a packet spotting
> network is that not legal? If I replace that friend with a skimmer, what is
> different? Besides that the skimmer doesn't have to sleep or take bathroom
> breaks, that is.
>
>
> David Robbins K1TTT
> e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net
> web: http://www.k1ttt.net
> AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Edward [mailto:sawyered@earthlink.net]
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2010 00:03
>> To: w5ov@w5ov.com; 'K1TTT'
>> Cc: cq-contest@contesting.com
>> Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update
>>
>> Unless everyone can use the remote receiver and then its okay...
>>
>> Glad I stick to simple unassisted. More fun...less fine print.
>>
>> Good Luck to all this weekend.
>>
>> Ed N1UR
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: w5ov@w5ov.com [mailto:w5ov@w5ov.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 6:14 PM
>> To: K1TTT
>> Cc: w5ov@w5ov.com; sawyered@earthlink.net; cq-contest@contesting.com
>> Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update
>>
>> Dave,
>>
>> The pertinent part is:
>>
>> 3. All transmitters and receivers used
>> by the entrant must be located within a
>> single 500-meter diameter circle or within
>> the property limits of the station
>> licensee's address, whichever is greater.
>>
>> 4. All antennas used by the entrant must
>> be physically connected by wires to the
>> transmitters and receivers used by the
>> entrant.
>>
>> No remote anything is permitted by the above.
>>
>> You can download the entire current rules here:
>>
>> http://www.cqww.com/rules/CQWW-Rules-2010.pdf
>>
>>
>> 73,
>>
>> Bob W5OV
>>
>>
>>
>>> Quote the rule.
>>>
>>>
>>> David Robbins K1TTT
>>> e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net
>>> web: http://www.k1ttt.net
>>> AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: w5ov@w5ov.com [mailto:w5ov@w5ov.com]
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 21:47
>>>> To: sawyered@earthlink.net
>>>> Cc: cq-contest@contesting.com
>>>> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update
>>>>
>>>> It has to do with you installing something outside of your own property
>>>> solely for your own use. This sort of thing is expressly forbidden in
>>>> the
>>>> rules.
>>>>
>>>> "Public" systems like this that anyone can connect to are all permitted
>>>> as
>>>> "assistance".
>>>>
>>>> Private vs. public.
>>>>
>>>> Do they provide the same info? Perhaps. But that's not the point.
>>>>
>>>> de W5OV
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> It doesn't really matter to me since I never use them.contest or no
>>>>> contest,
>>>>> but what exactly is the difference between a personal skimmer located
>>>> in
>>>>> Europe (for a W/VE contester) and a European Skimmer that displays
>> all
>>>> its
>>>>> info on the net. Aren't they both remote CW receivers that are
>>>> showing
>>>>> callsigns and frequencies that can be read by the W/VE station? The
>>>> CQ
>>>> WW
>>>>> rules make it seem like one is way more advantageous than the other
>>>> but
>>>> I
>>>>> am
>>>>> failing to see why.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ed N1UR
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>>>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>>
>>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|