Even though its called Central America, I don't recall that ever being a
continent. I believe North America goes all the way down to the HK/HP
border.
On 1/12/2011 11:42 AM, Ron Notarius W3WN wrote:
> If they're in Central America, why would we add them as multipliers to a
> North America contest?
>
> Or are we worried about Entity Discrimination here?
>
>
> Jan 12, 2011 11:22:58 AM, aa5jg@fidmail.com wrote:
>
> Why stop with Mexico? What about the states of the different central
> American countries? Are they any less deserving to count than Mexico?
>
> 73s John AA5JG
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve London"
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 2:40 PM
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Suggestion for NAQP
>
>
>> On 01/12/2011 07:05 AM, K1TTT wrote:
>>> But, but, but, that would change the whole nature of the contest. that
>>> would
>>> cause all the old records to be obsolete. that would change strategies.
>>> That might force some people to turn their antennas a bit. That might
>>> change the perennial winners a bit. that might make it more interesting.
>> Perennial winners ?
>>
>> Look at the top-5 in the August CW NAQP, that was just published in the
>> January/February NCJ. Compare that to the high-claimed scores in last
>> weekends'
>> NAQP. A very different list ! This is what makes the NAQP a great contest.
>>
>> 73,
>> Steve, N2IC
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|