CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Suggestion for NAQP

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Suggestion for NAQP
From: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
Reply-to: k0rc@citlink.net
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 19:52:00 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Yeah, what he said... and a score multiplier of 1.65 if you are past 
retirement age too...

73 de Bob - KØRC in MN


On 1/12/2011 6:01 PM, steve.root@culligan4water.com wrote:
> While we're at it, I think we should make zip code 55075 a multiplier.
>
> 73 Steve K0SR
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Doug Smith [mailto:dougw9wi@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 11:54 AM
> To: k3fiv@arrl.net
> Cc: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Suggestion for NAQP
>
>>> Jan 12, 2011 11:22:58 AM, aa5jg@fidmail.com wrote:>>  >>  Why stop with 
>>> Mexico? What about the states of the different central>>  American 
>>> countries? Are they any less deserving to count than Mexico? At least 
>>> literally, there are no states in the other Central American countries. 
>>> (they call their sub-national subdivisions something else) -- Doug Smith 
>>> W9WI Pleasant View, TN EM66 _______________________________________________ 
>>> CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com 
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>