To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Technology against cheating? |
From: | "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si> |
Date: | Mon, 28 Mar 2011 23:35:09 +0200 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
K5ZD wrote: The experience of the journey is far more important than the place in the standings. I couldn't agree more visiting Tunisia after yasmine revolution! My YU friends explained me WPX M/S rules change which I guess were made to prevent octopus cheating. However, it quickly became boring to operate mults station as 10 band changes limit occured within first 10 minutes with 15 meters band being so dominant for never ending runs. We are pleasantly surprised at 3V1A standing! 73 de Mario, TS/S56A, N1YU _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] 2010 ARRL SS CW Results Are Online, Kutzko, Sean, KX9X |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] WPX QRM - Time For A Rethink., brian coyne |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Technology against cheating?, Ron Notarius W3WN |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Technology against cheating?, Igor Sokolov |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |