CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW impt notice: optional modification to cabrillo for

To: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW impt notice: optional modification to cabrillo format
From: Luc Moreira <py8azt@dxbrasil.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 08:13:59 -0300
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
As I could understand, a team could operate as M/2, and depending the
others participants score, they could comment out some QSOs and send in the
log as M/S, and still into the rules.

It's like open a window (or wide door) to top notch cheating level on
Mult-Op category.

I hope there is nobody out there willing do it.

73, Luc
__
PW7T Team member
WRTC.2010 Brazilian Team Leader
PY8AZT (also PT7AG, PX8C, ZZ8Z, ZY7C)
LABRE, ARRL, CWJF & Fortaleza DX Group Member





2011/11/8 W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>

> Wait................
>
> So a Multi/Single can break the rules and have their contacts removed
> yet the other station gets to keep the contact even though the station
> they worked violated the rules?  So what is to stop the mult station
> from running and just marking the non mults as zero pointers?
>
> This sounds like trouble waiting to happen especially with some folks
> who will stretch the rules to the max.
>
> Explain to me how the mult station ends up working non mults?
>
> Mike W0MU
>
> J6M CQ WW DX CW Contest 2011
> J6/W0MU November 21 - December 1 2011
> W0MU-1 CC Cluster w0mu.net
>
>
> On 11/8/2011 4:54 AM, kr2q@optimum.net wrote:
> > Hi...
> >
> > I just received an inquiry (as shown below) and I thought it was worth
> posting here too.
> >
> > "We were M/S and find that we worked some non-mults with the mult
> station.  What should we
> > do?"
> >
> > New this year for CQWW, you can now include a contact row in your
> cabrillo file that WILL NOT
> > COUNT.  This means the log checking will ignore this QSO for you, but
> will NOT ignore it for the
> > "other guy."  This way, YOUR log is clean AND the other guy does not get
> dinged.
> >
> > How?
> >
> > Edit your cabrillo output as follows:
> >
> > For ONLY the row (or rows) you want to be ignored, insert an "X" (no
> quotes" in front of the
> > "QSO" portion of the row (no spaces).
> >
> > So a row that originally look like this:
> > QSO:  7011 CW 2009-11-28 0000 KT3Y   599 5      YU1LA         599 15
> 1
> >
> > Should be modified to look like this:
> > XQSO:  7011 CW 2009-11-28 0000 KT3Y   599 5      YU1LA         599 15
>   0
> >
> > For M/S, also note that you should change the "Transmitter ID" (last
> column) from "1" to "0"
> >
> > For full details (video) of the entire CQWW 2011 update, go to:
> >
> > http://www.pvrc.org/webinar/cqww_2011.wmv
> >
> > And THANKS again to the PVRC for hosting this.
> >
> > de Doug KR2Q
> > no "usual" disclaimer
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>