CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW impt notice: optional modification tocabrillo form

To: Igor Sokolov <ua9cdc@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW impt notice: optional modification tocabrillo format
From: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 09:08:26 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
and the rules say the multiplier station shall only work new 
multipliers......................  What is the difference.  It is ok to 
break one rule but not the other?

Mike W0MU

J6M CQ WW DX CW Contest 2011
J6/W0MU November 21 - December 1 2011
W0MU-1 CC Cluster w0mu.net


On 11/9/2011 7:06 AM, Igor Sokolov wrote:
>> Sure, they might get a new multiplier responding to their CQ from 
>> time to
>> time, but isn't this better than them calling CQ and saying "sorry, 
>> can't
>> work you now, you're not a multiplier" to the rest of us?
>>
>> W5OV
>
> CQWW rules are pretty specific  "...The multiplier station cannot call 
> CQ."
>
>
> 73, Igor UA9CDC
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>