CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] The importance of CHECKLOGS

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] The importance of CHECKLOGS
From: Marc - ON7SS - OO9O <on7ss.oo9o@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 18:24:36 +0100
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Gents,

Some of you didn'tread the mail correct.
We don't remove uniques just because it is a unique.
If it can be checked that the callsign exists, the QSO is credited.
If a callsign appears in more then one log, the QSO is credited.

A unique callsign faces only the possibility to be removed if no trace 
of that callsign can be found anywhere on the internet and even then we 
are very carefully about it.

73  Marc, ON7SS


ON7SS - OO9O
*Amateur Radio Station**
*Marc Domen*
* UBA HF Contest Manager *
*http://www.uba.behttp://www.on7ss.be


Op 22/11/2011 16:23, David Gilbert schreef:
> As I read the message from ON7SS, they don't only remove Uniques for the
> UBA ... they intend to remove contacts for any callsign that they cannot
> verify via any other independent database.  He specifically states that
> contacts with casual stations who only make "a few" contacts may be
> affected.  That seems fairly misguided to me.
>
> Dave   AB7E
>
>
> On 11/22/2011 6:03 AM, Bob Naumann wrote:
>> Just to be clear, the following are my own comments / opinion and although
>> truthful, my comments should not be construed as official commentary from
>> any contest committee I may be a member of.
>>
>> For at least the CQWW, no calls are removed in the manner described here by
>> ON7SS.
>>
>> If they are Unique (i.e.; that callsign only shows up in your log and no one
>> else's) they are flagged as Unique but they *ARE NOT* removed from your log.
>>
>> The only time such a call is removed is if it can be *proven* that the call
>> is busted (meaning it's not Unique, but instead is incorrect) or if there is
>> information available that the claimed QSO did not take place with the
>> holder of the callsign or something like that.
>>
>> Where is this idea coming from about removing Uniques from logs? (Again????)
>>
>> Bob W5OV
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>