Second the motion. I rarely send in a CQWW log (you don't wanna know, so
don't ask), but I'd hate to think that people who worked me didn't get
credit.
3333333,
Hans, K0HB/4ID
-----Original Message-----
From: David Gilbert
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 11:45 AM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] The importance of CHECKLOGS
I'm all for checklogs, but it seems to me that removing legitimate
contacts simply because a casual participant didn't send in his log is a
policy problem, not a procedural one. I for one would question whether
that really represents an advancement in the state of log checking
standards.
Dave AB7E
On 11/21/2011 9:15 AM, Marc - ON7SS - OO9O wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Every year again we have to remove QSO's from a contestlog because the
> callsign is not traceable.
>
> We all know that some people mainly non-contesters just make a few
> QSO's, or to work a new country, a new prefix or to give a friend a few
> points.
> What they don't realize, not being a contester, is that logchecking is
> growing to such standards that QSO's like that face the possibility to
> be removed from the log.
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|