Sure......whichever you prefer. For the point and click ops keeping the XIT
off-set while you work through your packet/skimmer generated list of needed
q's/mults is a good idea...especially for us guys on the receiving end.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe" <nss@mwt.net>
To: "Shane Mattson-->K1ZR" <k1zr@comcast.net>
Cc: cq-contest@contesting.com
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 1:28:32 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Reverse Beacon Network News - the lost art
actually tweak the XIT.
Ya want to receive the same freq, but transmit a tad slightly different than
the multitude.
Joe WB9SBD
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 8/13/2012 12:01 PM, Shane Mattson-->K1ZR wrote:
Meant to say 'tweak the VFO'! I'm a LID.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Shane Mattson-->K1ZR" <k1zr@comcast.net>
To: "Joe" <nss@mwt.net>
Cc: cq-contest@contesting.com
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 12:05:00 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Reverse Beacon Network News - the lost art
I wish all ops were like Joe. Point, click and then tweak the RIT to off-set
his signal which helps the receiving station differentiate him from the point
and click ops. Now that I'm seriously back into this game after a few years of
off-time the one big change that I'm not fond of for use in contests (most
importantly the 4 majors) is the Skimmer. Call me old fashioned....call me
whatever you'd like however I think the Skimmer takes the spirit out of cw
contesting and makes it too easy for everyone. Manually finding stations and
spotting them on the cluster now seems like the pure method (despite busted
calls from poor ops)......ironically when packet was introduced it was met with
the same resistance the skimmer has received. The difference is that
packet requires a human to find a station and post it on the cluster. In the
old days the challenge was to be the first to find a juicy multiplier and
decide whether or not you wanted to post it on the cluster or make someone else
work for it. Using automation to find stations and post to the cluster is
dumbing down the art of a human being finding unworked stations. I appreciate
the side of the casual op looking to squeeze in some operating time and thus
use the Skimmer spots to maximize their score during their limited on-time,
however my belief is that the use of such automation will adversely affect the
'art' of the sport in the long run. Yes, this topic has been beaten to
death.....and the contesting community has made very good points on both
sides. I'm all for new technology to help become a smarter, more efficient
operator however using technology to find stations during a contest without
human intervention is taking it a bit too far.
I absolutely love the use of the RBN s/n analysis tool which I use to compare
my signal to other competitors after each contest. This is great use of
technology!
-Shane K1ZR (SO no nothin' forever)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe" <nss@mwt.net>
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2012 10:16:10 AM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Reverse Beacon Network News - hopefully
of generalinterest
Sig
On 8/13/2012 7:20 AM, Martin , LU5DX wrote:
> I surely also understand Jim's concerns about gigantic pile ups with
> all stations calling exactly in the same frequency due to the RBN
> spots. I hope it is just a matter of time till ops realize we need to
> start calling stations a little off the spotted frequency.
Really?
I'm not a BIG contester, But have been contesting since 1975, LONG
before any of this existed. And as soon as I heard a pileup made by a
RBN spot I did notice how everyone was "Spot On" (pun intended)
And my first thought if I was to use this RBN network, I would at the
same time turn on my XIT to slide a tad off the mess some. I thought
everyone would do that and that this was not a unique thought. But I
guess not.
Joe WB9SBD
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|