[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] Single Op/Get Scores Assisted

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Single Op/Get Scores Assisted
From: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 05:51:55 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
We posted our score to the RU site in the last contest for the first time and, 
although hesitant about doing that, I'll admit it was fun and entertaining.  
Can't say I would have felt exactly the same if N3RS had been posting his score 
while trouncing us by about 8%.

I assume, but am not sure, that the only reason for using these sites is so you 
can look to see how you are doing compared to the competition. I am not sure 
about this but It makes sense then, to me, that single ops who are posting 
their scores are looking at that site - otherwise why post (for everyone else's 

It also makes sense that if you are looking at the site that you see others who 
are posting their scores and since you can see where the QSOs are racking up 
you know when and what band the other stations are running.  Although not a 
HUGE problem at the moment with the number of stations posting to these sites, 
it occurred to me that as it grows and even being suggested by NQ4I that it be 
required (probably not going to happen) that single op unassisted entrants are 
actually assisted since they can know when and what band a juicy multiplier 
they need is running.

Take just a little bite at a time and 10 years from now it could become a 
scheduling process where the stations are programmed to jump around the band 
working everyone with computer interfaces.  If there are new participants they 
will like it all in the name of technological advancement and the old guys will 
still be complaining.  

Next little bite, in my estimation, is getting Skimmer to copy and stack the 
call signs in a pile up to be picked off one after the other.  Surely this has 
been tried?  Just saying...

73...Stan, K5GO

Sent from my iPad
CQ-Contest mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>