[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Single Op/Get Scores Assisted

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Single Op/Get Scores Assisted
From: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:32:10 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Isn't this more along the lines of *IF* someone wants to cheat they will.

I can easily attach to a cluster and use it in a way nobody would ever know about. How many people are doing this now? We will never know unless they say something.

Where do you draw the line on technology? Bandscopes on every band is ok and are just an archaic form of RBN aren't they?

This is about integrity.

Mike W0MU

On 2/25/2013 5:10 AM, Stan Stockton wrote:
It doesn't matter if all the single ops leave off the band breakdowns.  The 
same opening notifications and more will be available by looking at the 
multi-operator categories - particularly M/M.

As it grows the number of instances of call sign fills for the guys you 
couldn't quite copy on 160 will become more prevalent....and using all that 
information is now allowed.

Get Scores will tell you however often it is chosen to update on what band a 
particular station is running.  There are no frequencies shown and that has 
been determined to be OK. How about adding all the stations from RBN calling CQ 
but without frequencies (just bands) shown?  Not a lot different than what you 
would have if everyone signed up for Get Scores.

Let's face the facts. You need to be on the Internet and take advantage of any and all 
internet assistance that is now allowed to maximize your success in a single operator, 
"unassisted" entry. Someone who does not have a computer connected to the 
Internet does not have all the possible advantages of someone who does have that 
connection in an unassisted entry.

73...Stan, K5GO

Sent from my iPad

On Feb 24, 2013, at 11:35 PM, Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org> wrote:

Hi Steve,

I do see your point.   The "player" remark was unfortunate... I can see in
these situations where it could make a difference.
So -- that's why you guys don't post.   However, you could post, motivating
others, by posting score not breakdown.  That is totally feasible.
That way, in your instance N2IC would see K5GN's score going up, but have
no idea why.

When K5ZD posts, he always masks his breakdown.

Perhaps you would consider posting your score if the site automatically
masked the breakdown of SO stations?

Food for thought...

I'm off to 8P in the morning... play more radio than internet.

73. Gerry

On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com> wrote:

On Feb 24, 2013, at 8:15 AM, Gerry Hull<gerry@yccc.org>  wrote:

Getscores has been up for more than five years, and the Russian site has
been up for a year or so.  No contesting authority has made any
against the sites, and I don't think they will.

If you are using the score posting site to make decisions about what to
in a contest, you are not a player at all.

Gerry, I don't know how to interpret this statement.

There is no doubt that the score posting system could provide valuable
information to the single-op, unassisted, serious competitor. Last
weekend's ARRL DX CW is a perfect example. N2IC(/5) and K5GN were both SOAB
HP, vying for the top spot in W5, and top-10 national positions. Neither of
us posted to, or watched the score posting sites, even though there is
nothing in the rules to stop us. However, for the sake of discussion, let's
say K5GN posted his score, with band breakdowns, and N2IC was observing the
score posting site. During the actual contest, K5GN did indeed catch good
European openings on 20 meters during the wee hours of the morning, both
mornings. N2IC did not, and in fact, didn't look for those openings. K5GN
made many more 20 meter QSO's, and finished ahead of N2IC. If N2IC could,
at a glance, see that K5GN was suddenly piling on 20 meter QSO's at strange
times of the day, do you think he would react to that information ? Would
he still be a "player" ? Would he still be unassisted ?

Steve, N2IC

CQ-Contest mailing list

CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest mailing list

CQ-Contest mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>