CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Why ARRL SSB Contest is Not My Favorite

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Why ARRL SSB Contest is Not My Favorite
From: John Laney <k4bai@att.net>
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 11:43:54 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
For one or two years in the 1970s, the ARRL International DX Contests had a change in the rules to permit everyone overseas to contact each other too. There was much dissatisfaction with it from W/VE stations because it resulted in many more DX stations working each other and ignoring the weaker W/VE stations even when the bands were open for working W/VE areas. Think of the former time for beginning the CQ 160 CW contest at 00Z and all the Eu stations were loud in NA but couldn'g hear the NA callers because they were too busy working other loud European stations. So the rule was changed back.

For a while in the 70s or 80s, we also had high band (10, 15, 20) and low band (40, 80, 160) categories. That may have been before we had single band categories.

The best change made since I started working the contests in 1956 was doing away with the quota system which allowed only a small number of QSOs by US stations with any given DX country. This meant that many of the smaller DX stations had to be or were ignored by the big US stations because they wouldn't count for points. It basically discouraged operation in populous DX contries except by the top stations and even they couldn't work a W/VE station for credit after the quota had been reached by the W/VE station.

73, John, K4BAI.
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>