CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Rules Changes

To: Steve Sacco NN4X <nn4x@embarqmail.com>, CQ-Contest <CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Rules Changes
From: Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 15:18:30 +0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Your analogy is not relevant to the discussion, Steve.  Your example
addresses the violation of rules  (which we'd all agree ought to be
penalized).

Poor copying or logging skills (busted calls, transposed serials, etc) are
not rules infractions.

These are not rewarded by points, just as a missed field goal is not
rewarded by points.  But I never saw an additional 3 points (or 6 or 9
points) removed for a missed FG.

73, Hans, K0HB

On Saturday, May 25, 2013, Steve Sacco NN4X wrote
>
>
> Actually, this exact type of issue has been worked out in any number of
> sports.
>
> Let's take American football: Depending upon the infraction, the offending
> team does not simply lose their turn, or force a "do over"; they're
> assessed yards, or a loss of down or similar.  The point is to encourage
> abiding by the rules, and strongly discourage breaking them by making their
> infraction painful, and causing them to not want to do it again.
>
>

-- 
73, de Hans, K0HB
"Just a boy and his radio"
--
Sea stories at --------> http://K0HB.wordpress.com
Superstition trails ---> http://OldSlowHans.com
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>