CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Rules Changes

To: "Steve Sacco NN4X" <nn4x@embarqmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Rules Changes
From: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 20:16:36 -0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
It’s not a bad example at all.  We are discussing the REMOVAL of points for 
operating shortcomings, not for rules violations.

If I transpose letters in a call sign, that is an operating shortcoming, just 
like missing an easy field goal.

I get no points for the attempted Q, the kicker gets no points for the 
attempted FG.  Next play.  

73, de Hans, K0HB



From: Steve Sacco NN4X 
Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2013 4:24 PM
To: Radio K0HB 
Cc: CQ-Contest 
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Rules Changes


Keeping the American football analogy going, you won't see points removed for 
missing a field goal, but that's a poor example.  
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>