CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotsh

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotshots would take the opportunity to drop down to the 24-hour category for the sake of an easy
From: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 16:02:29 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Exactly. Like it was in Classic days before spotting systems came to be.

Joe WB9SBD
Sig
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 10/23/2013 10:25 AM, Radio K0HB wrote:
My understanding is that the "Classic" overlay was intended as "a Boy and his Radio" class. Why would you want to screw with that?

73, de Hans, K0HB

-----Original Message----- From: Pete Smith N4ZR

I would just add one point.  I've been told that the 1 radio no spotting
caveats were added because some folks on the CQ Committee were concerned
that non-assisted hot-shots would drop down to the 24-hour overlay
unless these things were outlawed.  I frankly doubt this, particularly
with respect to the assisted/non-assisted angle.  However, instead of
sitting on the sidelines, it is important that supporters of the 24-hour
category enter it this year, so that we can credibly make the argument
for loosening that restriction next time.


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest



_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>