CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotsh

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotshots would take the opportunity to drop down to the 24-hour category for the sake of an easy
From: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 16:58:07 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
With spare time being at an all time premium and our ages continuing to climb the 24 hour option could take over and leave very little left after 30 or 36 hours when most everyone will have used up their time.

There should have been an assisted category.


Mike W0MU

On 10/23/2013 10:55 AM, David Gilbert wrote:

As a long time (and vocal) proponent of a 24 hour category, I really don't have a problem with the restrictions. It was never intended to appeal to "hard core" contesters, who are much more likely to push for more hours, and I would place most SO2R players in that hard core category. It was intended to encourage hams who knew they would never place high in a 48 hour category (remember those 90% who operate less than 24 hours?) to make a serious effort ... and going up against SO2R stations hardly does that.

In addition, one of the appeals to me of a 24 hour category was the additional emphasis on strategy that it would bring. The choice of operating times and bands presumably will have even greater leverage, and relying on spotting assistance to help make those decisions defeats that. The emphasis now is on operators having to make their own choices instead of band maps doing it for them.

So I'm fine with the rules as they are now and I hope they don't change.

73,
Dave   AB7E



On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 6:59 AM, Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>wrote:
Bravo, Steve!

I would just add one point. I've been told that the 1 radio no spotting caveats were added because some folks on the CQ Committee were concerned that non-assisted hot-shots would drop down to the 24-hour overlay unless
these things were outlawed.  I frankly doubt this, particularly with
respect to the assisted/non-assisted angle. However, instead of sitting on
the sidelines, it is important that supporters of the 24-hour category
enter it this year, so that we can credibly make the argument for loosening
that restriction next time.

To encourage participation, I have funded a Classic overlay/World top
score plaque for 2013. It doesn't show up on the web site yet, but it *is*
funded, and I'm sure they'll fix that before the contest. This is your
chance for some nice hardwood.

73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at
http://reversebeacon.net,
blog at reversebeacon.blogspot.com.
For spots, please go to your favorite
ARC V6 or VE7CC DX cluster node.

On 10/22/2013 9:26 AM, Steve London wrote:

And a special reminder....

There is a new overlay entry category - CLASSIC

The principle features are:

- 24 hours
- 1 radio
- No DX spotting

See the rules for more details.

Many CQ-Contest readers have been asking for this category. Hope you will
be taking advantage of it.

73,
Steve, N2IC


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>