CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Comments on CQWW Rules

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Comments on CQWW Rules
From: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 20:41:21 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Yes, some of us still do, Barry.

73, ron w3wn

-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
Barry
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 12:56 PM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Comments on CQWW Rules

I propose the term S & P be updated to our modern world.  It's time to 
call it C & P  (click and pounce).  Does anyone really Search any more?

Barry W2UP

On 6/24/2014 10:39, Radio K0HB wrote:
> Hey, guys.  I got it!!!!  We can solve this easily.
>
> Just outlaw S&P stations and the whole problem goes away.  Who needs 
> 'em anyhow!
>
>
> 73, de Hans, K0HB
> -- 
> "Just a boy and his radio"T
> -- 
>
>
>
> -----Original Message----- From: W0MU Mike Fatchett
> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 2:47 PM
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Comments on CQWW Rules
>
> The aim is gain two way contacts?    I thought it was to work as many
> people as possible and as many mults.  Pileup control is done by giving
> callsigns.  So in an effort to placate the I NEED IT NOW  society a
> rules change has been made to remove a viable strategy from a run
> station so that S&P stations can get a call or verify a call faster.
>
> The next rule change we need is that everyone gets a shiny trophy and we
> have no winners and losers..................
>
>
> Mike W0MU
>
> On 6/23/2014 10:25 PM, Christian Schneider wrote:
>> AF6O wrote:
>> >Once you try to force a competitor to adopt a strategy to boost his
>> competitors score it ceases to be a contest.
>>
>> With the aim of the contest being to gain as much TWO-WAY-contacts, 
>> the other half of a qso seems to be such an essential part(ner) of 
>> the action that the decision does not seem to be unwise. Oh, and it 
>> is simply fair to take care of that point. But YMMV
>> Chris DL8MBS
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection 
is active.
http://www.avast.com

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>