CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB

To: "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB
From: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 03:13:35 +0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Regardless of what I might personally think about certain geopolitical events, 
I wholeheartedly agree with Dave's sentiments.

I do wonder, however, if this sets a poor precedent for a future installment of 
CQWW, should someone seek to enter from the Spratlys, Scarborough Reef, Navassa 
Island, or other similar places.

-- 
Michael Adams | N1EN | mda@n1en.org

> Andy,
> 
> Politics and ham radio should be kept separate and operation should be
> encouraged everywhere.  Indeed, I would say that only positive developments
> can come from continued communication, amateur radio or otherwise. There
> are better ways to deal with the current situation than to discourage (if not
> prevent) participation and even deleting QSOs that are permitted and perfectly
> legal from both sides.
> 
> I hope to work you next weekend, whether it counts or not!
> 
> 73, Dave K3ZJ
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>