CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] LY9W ? - time to ban SCP?

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] LY9W ? - time to ban SCP?
From: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: k9yc@arrl.net
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 15:32:21 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On Thu,7/30/2015 11:57 AM, David Gilbert wrote:
Doug, I totally agree with you on this, and have for quite some time. I used to use SCP some years ago, but don't anymore because it simply feels like cheating.

I agree, except that it's a level playing field. (:

Actually, many of the major contests have exchanges that are nearly automatic. Take CQWW -- only a few countries are in more than one zone, and the logging program autofills the exchange as soon as you enter a call, so all you have to do is copy the call and log it. It's beyond me why it's considered a major contest. RAC is also super easy, no ambiguity at all for the Canadian stations, which is where all the points are. The hard part is finding the stations to work.

The challenging ones are NA Sprint (because you're splitting your brain in too many pieces), and ARRL Sweepstakes there's actually an exchange to copy! Some of the Russian contests would be interesting if propagation from W6 to much of UA was good enough that we could work more than a few hours. I tried working WAG last season -- I had propagation on one band for 45 minutes.

73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>