CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CR3L Should Reconsider Submission Catagory

To: Chuck Dietz <w5prchuck@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CR3L Should Reconsider Submission Catagory
From: Jorge Diez - CX6VM <cx6vm.jorge@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 08:52:58 -0300
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Well, really not only CR3L members thik on this way, and thats bad for our
hobby

Please CQWW CC, avoid the entry I sent in my log and put me in an entry
where I can win a plaque or certtificate, hi hi hi....

Well, the bad thing is like always, because of a few, others will try to
protect and this will be bad for all of us.

I think PJ2T and many others like me will not post the scores, at least
before log submission deadline

73,
Jorge
CX6VM/CW5W

2015-12-08 3:32 GMT-03:00 Chuck Dietz <w5prchuck@gmail.com>:

> I agree with David  If I entered the Ten Meter Contest this weekend and
> made CW and SSB Qs, I should be able to choose which category I finally
> enter... CW, SSB or Both    I see this as an allowed action by the rules
>
> Chuck.
>
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 4:28 PM, David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > What exactly is "unsportsmanlike" about it?  They (apparently) qualified
> > for both M/2 and M/M ... equally.  They posted to 3830 and had to choose
> > one at that point, but they had the option to choose either category
> right
> > up until the official contest submission deadline.  They presumably
> didn't
> > cheat, and the worst that could be said about them is that they misled
> you
> > regarding their intended category with a 3830 posting they had no
> > obligation to make in the first place.  They didn't even have to be
> honest
> > in their 3830 posting since it has nothing to do with their official
> entry!
> >
> > They competed identically ... and fairly ... whether they entered M/2 or
> > MM.  Nothing offensive about that in my opinion.
> >
> > Dave   AB7E
> >
> >
> >
> > On 12/7/2015 10:44 AM, John Crovelli wrote:
> >
> >> The CR3L Team should reconsider their decision to change from M/2 to
> M/M.
> >> Their clear intent was to enter M/2 and posting their score on 3830 as
> such
> >> immediately following the CQWW CW is evidence they most likely complied
> >> with all applicable rules for a M/2 entry.  It was only post-contest
> was it
> >> evident there was an opportunity to win M/M.
> >> In my opinion, which seems to run with the majority based upon the
> dozens
> >> of comments made on this forum, the CR3L decision to change entry
> >> categories at the 11th hour, apparently to secure a winning score in the
> >> M/M entry class, is unsportsmanlike and offensive.  The CR3L team
> deserves
> >> to bare the brunt of the nearly universal negative commentary having
> taken
> >> this action.  Yes, what was done is allowed under the rules, but going
> down
> >> this path is well outside the spirit of fair competition.
> >> I hope the CR3L team will reconsider what they have done and proceed to
> >> seek an administrative entry class change back to M/2 through
> negotiation
> >> with the CQ Contest Committee Chairman.
> >> It is not to late to correct this wrong......it would be the class right
> >> thing to do under this circumstance.
> >> Regards,
> >> John CrovelliW2GD/P40W
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> CQ-Contest mailing list
> >> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> >> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>



-- 
73,
Jorge
CX6VM/CW5W
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>