Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CR3L Should Reconsider Submission Catagory |
---|---|
From: | Rudy Bakalov via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Reply-to: | Rudy Bakalov <r_bakalov@yahoo.com> |
Date: | Tue, 8 Dec 2015 20:20:42 -0800 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
You are kidding, right? A M/2 stations beats the pants out of a M/M station and now the M/2 is a sore loser?! PJ2T had every opportunity to win. Kudos to the CR3L team for doing such a great job. For that matter, PJ2T did as well as W3LPL and one would expect better from a Caribbean station. Rudy N2WQ Sent using a tiny keyboard. Please excuse brevity, typos, or inappropriate autocorrect. > On Dec 8, 2015, at 7:19 PM, Jeff Clarke <ku8e@bellsouth.net> wrote: > > But the last one is the most important word - " sore loser " _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] High Rate Dual Radio CQing, Radio K0HB |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CR3L Should Reconsider Submission Category, W0MU |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CR3L Should Reconsider Submission Catagory, Jeff Clarke |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CR3L Should Reconsider Submission Catagory, Michael Schulz |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |