CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CR3L Should Reconsider Submission Catagory

To: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CR3L Should Reconsider Submission Catagory
From: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 22:19:40 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Kelly, It's much more than just trying to gain an unfair advantage. Please 
reread the the first paragraph which contains words like "respect , fairness, 
ethics and fellowship". But the last one is the most important word - " sore 
loser "

JeffOn Dec 8, 2015 9:58 PM, Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net> wrote:
>
> One could argue poor sportsmanship is being displayed by those kvetching 
> about their win, especially absent any facts. 
>
> A definition of poor sportsmanship in the link you provide is "…breaking the 
> rules to gain an unfair advantage." 
>
> What rules have been broken and what's the "unfair advantage" of a lowly M2 
> station beating a MM? 
>
> 73 kelly 
> ve4xt 
>
>
> On 2015-12-08, at 6:33 PM, Jeff Clarke <ku8e@bellsouth.net> wrote: 
>
> > https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sportsmanship 
> > 
> > It's pretty obvious to me the definition of sportsmanship is different in 
> > Europe is different than it is here in the United States. 
> > 
> > Read the above link and tell me if CR3L is being a good sport? 
> > 
> > This email thread has been nothing about anyone breaking any rules because 
> > it's pretty apparent to me that the rules are broken if they allow this to 
> > happen. 
> > 
> > Jeff 
> > _______________________________________________ 
> > CQ-Contest mailing list 
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com 
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest 
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>