[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CR3L Should Reconsider Submission Catagory

To: Maarten van Rossum <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CR3L Should Reconsider Submission Catagory
From: Kevan Nason <knason00@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 14:21:42 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>

I believe I was the first to mention "sore loser", not Jeff.  He shouldn't
bear the brunt of return comments on that one.


On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Maarten van Rossum <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>

> Jeff, why do you only comment on the part where Mike wrote: "They could
> only be a sore looser if indeed they did loose, but they didn't"?
> Yes, they would have lost the M/2 category, good point.
> But what about the parts where Mike commented on respect, fairness, ethics
> and fellowship?
> I can't help it but the words "sore loser" keep coming to my mind when I
> read posts like this.
> 73, Maarten PD2R
CQ-Contest mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>