I believe I was the first to mention "sore loser", not Jeff. He shouldn't
bear the brunt of return comments on that one.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Maarten van Rossum <email@example.com>
> Jeff, why do you only comment on the part where Mike wrote: "They could
> only be a sore looser if indeed they did loose, but they didn't"?
> Yes, they would have lost the M/2 category, good point.
> But what about the parts where Mike commented on respect, fairness, ethics
> and fellowship?
> I can't help it but the words "sore loser" keep coming to my mind when I
> read posts like this.
> 73, Maarten PD2R
CQ-Contest mailing list