CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Absurd Rule in NAQP

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Absurd Rule in NAQP
From: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: k9yc@arrl.net
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 22:29:18 -0800
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On Sat,1/16/2016 1:24 PM, Pete Smith N4ZR wrote:
It's hard for me to understand why NAQP would cling to this antiquated situation.

Because NAQP is basically designed for a boy and his 100W radio. No amp, no assistance. Use of spots changes the nature of the contest. One of the most fun aspects of these contests is team competition, and Multi-ops are not eligible. Certainly there's benefit in Multi-single for training, but I really see NAQP as a SO LP unassisted contest.

73, Jim K9YC




_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>