To: | "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Open Letter to VE Contesters |
From: | Roger Parsons via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Reply-to: | Roger Parsons <ve3zi@yahoo.com> |
Date: | Tue, 23 Feb 2016 15:57:36 +0000 (UTC) |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Sounds reasonable particularly if applied world-wide - but then I don't operate SSB. While we're about it, how about all of us complying with the band plan on 160m? OK, that's not very practicable because of the limited frequencies available in some countries. How about setting the lower band edge for SSB contests on 160m to be 1820kHz? That way the contesters get 32kHz of 'prime' space (and 182kHz of total space) and the rest of us get 8kHz. That seems to me to be a fair compromise. And all it needs is for the contest organisers to write it into the rules. 73 Roger VE3ZI _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] too much complaining about "poor ops" + how to "get even", john@kk9a.com |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Another grip..... Slow down!, Gerry Hull |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Open Letter to VE Contesters, Ed Richardson |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Open Letter to VE Contesters, Mike Smith VE9AA |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |