CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Open Letter to VE Contesters

To: sawyered@earthlink.net
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Open Letter to VE Contesters
From: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 22:52:22 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I would suggest that if you want a level playing field - mano-a-mano - the
opportunity will be available a few years from now in DL land.  Will be
interesting to see if YOU qualify to be there.  I expect at least one of
the folks on your list WILL be there :-)  A few phone Q's in a non-U.S.
sub-band won't be the tipping point that will help him secure a seat there
:-)

Tom - VE3CX


This email has been sent from a virus-free computer protected by Avast.
www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email>
<#DDB4FAA8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 7:27 PM, Ed Sawyer <sawyered@earthlink.net> wrote:

> Ed VE4EAR, has nicely made my case as to why its unfairly advantageous to
> be
> able to operate below the US subbands.
>
>
>
> To be clear, the current open letter is not attempting to change the rules.
> Its to see if the top contenders from VE will voluntarily even the contest
> mono - mono and take that unsurmountable advantage off the table.
>
>
>
> I personally have no issue with further west VE's taking advantage of that
> given advantage, however further west USA stations may have a different
> opinion.
>
>
>
> Ed  N1UR
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>