To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net |
From: | "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net> |
Reply-to: | sawyered@earthlink.net |
Date: | Wed, 6 Apr 2016 10:16:54 -0400 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
KE0L said "Me too! I think so2r is a huge advantage over so1r. I bet we would see more newbies stay with contesting if they felt they had a fighting chance to win with their so1r setup. They put in a FT effort only to find out someone has 50% more Qs than they have. After all this is a competition so they should be in their own class. Then when they are ready they too can invest in multiple towers with stacked beams and so2r. If it is the goal to increase activity in contesting I feel we should not scare away those SO1R operators but rather recognize their efforts." You are in luck. There already exists such an overlay category. Its called "Classic". Just lobby the sponsors to add assisted and enjoy. You should lobby the ARRL and other CQ contest managers to do the same. 73 Ed N1UR _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net, Rudy Bakalov via CQ-Contest |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net, Ed Sawyer |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net, john@kk9a.com |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net, Ed Sawyer |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |