CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Convergence and Change

To: <steve.root@culligan4water.com>, <CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Convergence and Change
From: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>
Reply-to: k5zd@charter.net
Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 23:30:56 -0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
To prevent confusion...  There has been no decision or announcement about
any changes in the CQ WW Contest rules for 2016.

All of the speculation here has been in regards to an editorial that
appeared in the May 2016 issue of CQ Magazine.

Randy, K5ZD


> -----Original Message-----
> From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
> steve.root@culligan4water.com
> Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 3:44 PM
> To: CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Convergence and Change
> 
>  First, we are considered guilty until proven innocent. Thus the
> requirement to make an audio recording of the whole contest. I find this
> onerous.
> 
> Then we are told it's not a big deal, since most of us are mere
> "participants" and not real competitors. I find this insulting.
> 
> I've been on the fence as to whether I'd even bother to send in a log for
> the CQWW ever again.
> 
> Now they decide to eliminate the category I operate, SOHP. I guess
> they've made my mind up for me.
> 
> 73 Steve K0SR
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>