CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW madness

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW madness
From: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: sawyered@earthlink.net
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2016 20:50:10 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Why are we beating up the CQWW contest? SS and NAQP are not fair either.
Just advantage those outside W1 and W2 so somehow that makes it okay that
they are unfair.  Same propagation problems and the scoring doesn't offset
it.  And those contest are hardly growing compared to CQWW.  Why not fix
those first, and see how it goes, rather than starting with CQWW which
doesn't look to need fixing according to ant statistics that I see.

 

I repeat - create a new contest to solve this issue.  Just make sure you
skew the rules enough so that a guy in California with a 50 ft tower and a
tribander can win.  Otherwise its not fair right?

 

Ed  N1UR

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>