CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating

To: Radio KØHB <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating
From: James Duffey <jamesduffey@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 14:58:13 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Thanks Hans. I hope we can get together sometime when you are in AZ for the 
winter or I am up there visiting family. - Duffey KK6MC 

On Aug 24, 2016, at 2:54 PM, Radio KØHB <kzerohb@gmail.com> wrote:

> Point taken, Duffey.
>  
> I hereby amend my statement to read “It insults the community of hams, more 
> than 99% of who play be the rules.”  (If that results in fractional hams, 
> please round to the nearest larger integer.)
>  
> 73, de Hans, KØHB
> "Just a boy and his radio"™
>  
> From: James Duffey
> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 8:48 PM
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Cc: James Duffey; kzerohb@gmail.com
> Subject: Cheating
>  
> Hans - It is straight forward to calculate the percentage of hams that play 
> by the rules in ham contesting and it is less than the 99.99% number you 
> claim.
>  
> Consider: Not counting check logs, there were 7,899 entrants to the 2015 CQ 
> WW SSB DX contest. 39 of those were disqualified for not following the rules. 
> Cheating if you will.  That would put the occurrence of honest operators in 
> CQ WW SSB DX at about 99.5%, not 99.99%. That ignores the warnings 
> distributed about questionable behavior, which were about the same number, 
> and the people who don’t get caught. You may think the difference between the 
> two percentages small, but it is the difference between the 39 who cheated in 
>  a single contest and only one being cheating (actually less than one, but 
> humans occur in integer quantities).
>  
> We tend to view the world on the basis of our own local personal interactions 
> and observations. If your neighborhood of hams that you interact with is 
> 99.99% playing by the rules, which apparently it is, you tend to think that 
> is true of all hams everywhere. But, it isn’t necessarily, and the CQ WW SSB 
> results demonstrate that. Extrapolating local observations onto a global view 
> can be inaccurate.
>  
> Sorry for one more jeremiad to the list. I tried to keep it objective and 
> verifiable. Most hams are honest, but among DX contesters it is not 99.99%.  
> - Duffey KK6MC
>  
> Hans - You wrote “It insults the community of hams, 99.99% of who play by the 
> rules.”

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>