Tom,
Did you read the article? It was not about cheating at all. Let me
assure you as a very active MMO player from many games, cheating is
rampant. The cheat never even appears in the article.
The article you linked was that people trusted their fellow guild mates
and were open to sharing their private information. I would agree with
that. I have had plenty of my online friends that I would have never
believed would have ever cheated or exploited in a game, banned from them.
Why are we covering for the cheating? Because people know that it is
far worse than ever imagined?
W0MU
On 8/24/2016 8:29 AM, Tom Frenaye wrote:
Yes, I agree with Hans. Contesters probably cheat less than others when it
comes to ham radio activities, at least this study on a related subject
suggests it.
http://phys.org/news/2016-08-explores-online-gamers-psychology.html
-- Tom
At 01:53 AM 8/24/2016, AB7E wrote:
Fine for you to defend your friends, Hans, and you may be right.
But you've gone over into some stark raving fantasy world when you claim that
99.99% of contesters don't cheat. There isn't any segment of humanity anywhere
that honest, and I find it hilarious that anybody would think that hams are
somehow more honest than the average human.
Studies, tests, and observations over decades by LOTS of different sociologists
prove that you aren't even close in your opinion. Deny it all you want, but
humans are wired to seek every advantage they can in almost all situations, and
it is only our learned behavior boundaries that hold us back from breaking
rules.
In real life people lie, they cheat, they dishonor, they fudge ... to one
degree or another depending upon the situation. And that's out in the open
with real stakes involved. What on earth makes you think that an essentially
random slice of the population (ham radio contesters) operating with almost
zero external scrutiny in an event with virtually no jeopardy is going to
magically be different??
And for heaven's sake quit with the neighborhood crap. Absolutely none of my
comments bear any relation to any contester I know because my comments derive
from reading I've done on the subject and observations I've made during my 69
years on this earth involving people I've met in over 30 countries.
It would be interesting for someone to create a truly anonymous survey of active
contesters with the simple question "in all of your years of contesting, can you
honestly claim that you've never knowingly violated any rule, no matter how
trivial?" One of us is going to be very surprised by the result.
Dave AB7E
On 8/23/2016 2:39 PM, Radio K0HB wrote:
My "neighborhood" of contesting and DX'ing friends are guys like NØAT,
KØKK, KØTO, KØIR, KØKX, KTØR(SK), KØFVF(SK), KØRC, KØSR, KØAD, WØAIH,
KØMD,
NØIJ, WØGJ, K4IU, KØMPH, etc.
There is NOBODY in that group, and hundreds more that I know now, and have
known over my 50-some years in DX and Radio-sporting, that I can imagine
being outside the rules, even just a smidgen.
The interminable jeremiads crying "cheat" on CQ-Contest, mostly by noted
hams whose credentials I otherwise admire, is loutish and Ill-mannered. It
insults the community of hams, 99.99% of who play by the rules.
If you know a cheater, well then turn him in; but don't condone the
widespread internet trashing of hams in general. We are better than that.
Your neighborhood may vary.
73, HB
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
e-mail: frenaye@pcnet.com YCCC --> http://www.yccc.org/
Tom Frenaye, K1KI, P O Box J, West Suffield CT 06093 Phone: 860-668-5444
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|