CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC Entry Reclassified to High Power

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC Entry Reclassified to High Power
From: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 12:30:28 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Winning a contest typically involves working more causal operators than
the competition. Deleting valid QSOs would certainly discourage serious
competition.

John KK9A


To:     cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject:        Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC Entry Reclassified to High Power
From:   Richard F DiDonna NN3W <richnn3w@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 7 Oct 2016 00:16:52 -0400

I lost quite a few QSOs. For a number of years, the Russia DX was the same
weekend as the Virginia QSO party. In the FCC database, my callsign was
listed as being a Virginia address. For many logging programs, I would pop
up as being a Virginia QSO party multiplier and casual ops who were
focusing their efforts on the Virginia QSO party would work me for a QSO.
There, I lost points, which is absolutely stupid IMHO.

Casual ops are the bread and butter of DX contest stations and
discouraging them doesn't send a very good message.

73 Rich NN3W

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>