CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CX2DK CQWW checklog

To: Scott Robbins <w4pa@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CX2DK CQWW checklog
From: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2017 18:11:12 -0800
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Scott,

Were all Top 3 World or Continent operations asked to provide a recording?

If so, good. If not, why not?

73, kelly, ve4xt




> On Mar 3, 2017, at 1:26 PM, Scott Robbins via CQ-Contest 
> <cq-contest@contesting.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Jorge -
> Recordings are requested by the log checkers to validate entry categories or 
> other details about the contest operation. 
> My advice for serious participants in CQWW is to review the rules before the 
> contest starts, and assure that if you intend to field a competitive entry 
> that everything asked for will be completed.  It is easy to record all 48 
> hours of a contest operation.  This has been discussed at length in this 
> forum and others over the past 2 years. 
> Scott RobbinsW4PA
> 
> 
> 
>      From: Jorge Diez - CX6VM <cx6vm.jorge@gmail.com 
> <mailto:cx6vm.jorge@gmail.com>>
> To: Scott Robbins <w4pa@yahoo.com <mailto:w4pa@yahoo.com>> 
> Cc: CQ CONTEST <cq-contest@contesting.com <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>>
> Sent: Friday, March 3, 2017 4:15 PM
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CX2DK CQWW checklog
> 
> Scott
> ok, is in the rules, thats right, someone put this in the rule, nothing to do 
> with radio, I take care of my radio and antennas, but someone add this, and 
> maybe will add more things that have nothing to do with the station.
> Just my dude, do you think is something wrong with CX2DK log, cheating? Or is 
> just that he didn't record the contest?
> Rules also say 
> B. Observer Program: The Committee may request of any entrant to accept a 
> visit by an observer during the contest. Failure to allow a Committee 
> appointed observer full access to the station during the contest period may 
> result in the entry being a Checklog
> 
> Did you sent any observer during 2016 contests?  The point if that CC is 
> passing the responsibility for the participants, Any year we must do more and 
> more things to participate
> 73,JorgeCX6VM/CW5W
> 2017-03-03 17:37 GMT-03:00 Scott Robbins via CQ-Contest 
> <cq-contest@contesting.com>:
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> The CQWW has changed the rules since 2015. Now the single op stations must
>> have the recorded audio of the contest on separate channels so that
>> everything is transparent and without lies.
> 
>> In case the organization of the contest considers it necessary, they ask
>> for it.
> 
>> But, I don't have audio recording and internet.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Marcelo:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Per section XII. C. of the rules if you are in a top 3 World or Continent 
> claimed score for your entry category you are required to provide a recording 
> of your operation, if asked.The CQWW log checkers wanted to hear a recording 
> of your 2016 operation.  You  were unable to provide this.  We reclassified 
> your entry as a checklog as a result.I was informed by the log checkers that 
> you were also asked for a recording after the 2015 contest, and did not 
> provide one.  The log checkers archived your reply email from after the 2015 
> contest stating you did not have a recording for that contest either, which I 
> have reviewed.  This demonstrates to me you were both aware of the rule, and 
> chose not to follow it.  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 73
> 
> Scott Robbins
> W4PA
> ______________________________ _________________
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 73,
> Jorge
> CX6VM/CW5W
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com <mailto:CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest 
> <http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>