CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CX2DK CQWW checklog

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CX2DK CQWW checklog
From: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2017 20:00:19 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Do we know if there are other suspicions? No. Maybe there are. The committee is tight lipped on what they do to find suspected cheaters which they should be, no need to educate those gaming our game.

The rules are quite clear to me and the intention of the operator was to win, so he needs to follow all the rules not just some of them.

Some times people have to learn the hard way.

Without all the facts we must refrain from making judgements based on what we might think happened. We are not helping matters with our guesses.

W0MU


On 3/3/2017 5:17 PM, Rudy Bakalov via CQ-Contest wrote:
Not knowing the full details, however, it seems that the station has been DQ'd 
solely due to the lack of audio recording. That is, no other rule violation or 
suspected violation was mentioned. So if indeed the log checker did not have 
any other concerns and the lack of recording was the only reason, the DQ seems 
a bit excessive.

Rudy N2WQ
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>