To be clear, I don't know the guy and am not trying to defend him. I am
commenting on what we know the facts to be.
The facts are that the rules state that the audio recording is used to help
adjudicate the log. The key word is help.
So in both instances, the log checker didn't have issues with the log, but
requested the recording anyway. W4PA didn't mention any issues either and only
reiterated that they asked for the recording and didn't get it.
Assuming there were no real violations and issues, IMHO, reclassifying the log
as checklog seems excessive.
Rudy N2WQ
Sent using a tiny keyboard. Please excuse brevity, typos, or inappropriate
autocorrect.
> On Mar 3, 2017, at 8:50 PM, <ko7ss@yahoo.com> <ko7ss@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> 2 years in a row he refuses to provide a recording when asked. What penalty
> would you suggest if not a DQ?
>
> 73, Bill KO7SS
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|