Re: [CQ-Contest] CX2DK DQ

[W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>]

You don't know what they wanted the audio for.  W4PA did not say and 
does not have to say.  Tell us, lets the cat out of the bag so to speak.
What is troubling to me is that there is little trust that these 
volunteers are doing their jobs correctly.
Once again I asked why is to be gained by the committee by reclassifying 
this log?  Nothing.
I suspect they have reasons to believe that there could be issues with 
this log.  The recording could have helped clear this individual but he 
failed to adhere to the rules two years in a row.
Can we move on to real issues.  Follow the rules and stop cheating.

W0MU


On 3/4/2017 6:04 AM, Rudy Bakalov via CQ-Contest wrote:
> To be clear, I don't know the guy and am not trying to defend him.  I am 
> commenting on what we know the facts to be.
>
> The facts are that the rules state that the audio recording is used to help 
> adjudicate the log. The key word is help.
>
> So in both instances, the log checker didn't have issues with the log, but 
> requested the recording anyway.  W4PA didn't mention any issues either and only 
> reiterated that they asked for the recording and didn't get it.
>
> Assuming there were no real violations and issues, IMHO, reclassifying the log 
> as checklog seems excessive.
>
> Rudy N2WQ
>
> Sent using a tiny keyboard.  Please excuse brevity, typos, or inappropriate 
> autocorrect.
>
>
> > On Mar 3, 2017, at 8:50 PM, <ko7ss@yahoo.com> <ko7ss@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > 2 years in a row he refuses to provide a recording when asked. What penalty 
> > would you suggest if not a DQ?
> >
> > 73, Bill KO7SS
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest