CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Assisted - Is it just another Urban Myth ?

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Assisted - Is it just another Urban Myth ?
From: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 11:05:41 -0300
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Trent, 

 

You are missing the point.  Scores have NOTHING to do with the two distinct
2 categories.

 

Mike VE9AA

= = = = = = = =

Hi Ed, 

 

You said, 

 

"Others are simply looking at the efficiency gain of being fed spots and the


fact that their eyes add another receptor beyond their 2 ears and that adds
to 

their efficiency as well."

 

Please find one example in the High Scores of the CQWW or the CQWPX that 

supports your hypothesis ... 

 

By the way I prefer SOAB unassisted - if on the rare occasion I am not in a 

multi op 

 

Regards 

 

 

Trent Sampson

VK4TS 

Po Box 275 Mooloolaba QLD 4557 

Mobile 0408497550

 

 

Mike, Coreen & Corey

Keswick Ridge, NB

 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>