CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Emails During a Contest

To: "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Emails During a Contest
From: Edward Sawyer <EdwardS@sbelectronics.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 18:54:54 -0400
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Which is why identifying to the contest director is the answer.  If he submits, 
then it should be dealt with.  If he doesn't then its an issue settled.

Ed  N1UR

-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of mike 
stokes
Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 6:16 PM
To: Jim
Cc: cq-contest@contesting.com; ku8e
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Emails During a Contest

If he submits his contest log, then there is no question that it is unethical 
and cheating.

But, assuming he doesn't submit his log, it is no different than emailing and 
asking you county, grid square, or other info.  If he is not submitting a log, 
he doesn't have to follow the rules.

Mike
KK9V

On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 2:39 PM Jim via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
wrote:

> Yes, it is cheating or at least highly unethical.
>
> Having read subsequent posts that it was from a serious competitor who 
> should have known better, the immediate response to him might have 
> been to say "no, I sent you XXXX", where XXXX is not what you sent 
> him. If he believes you, at least he will lose that QSO. For a casual 
> likely newcomer I’d have just ignored it, or perhaps politely replied “No 
> thanks”.
>
> And forwarding the email to the contest director was indeed appropriate.
>
>
> 73  -  Jim   K8MR
>
>
>
> > On Apr 1, 2019, at 10:48 PM, ku8e <ku8e@ku8e.com> wrote:
> >
> > I had a station who I worked during the WPX SSB contest send me an 
> > email
> during the contest asking what the number I sent him was. I guess he 
> wasn't sure when he worked me.Do you think this is cheating? 
> Personally I think this is cheating. Maybe I should forward that email 
> to CQ? It really irks me when people blatantly cheat and think there 
> are no consequences. Also there were way too many stations on 40 
> meters from Europe that were probably cheating by running some serious 
> power. It's frustrating when you call someone who is 30db over S9 and 
> they CQ in your face. It's not like I have a crummy antenna on that 
> band plus I'm running an amp. Maybe someone in Europe can explain to 
> me what I'm missing?Jeff KU8E Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy 
> smartphone
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>


--
Mike Stokes
KK9V
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>