CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] WW-Digi Contest -- Rule Clarification

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] WW-Digi Contest -- Rule Clarification
From: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: k9yc@arrl.net
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 17:51:25 -0700
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On 8/6/2019 5:30 PM, Randy Thompson K5ZD wrote:
There are several software packages available that have taken the WSJT
decoding engine and created the ability to make multiple QSOs at the same
time.  It is just a matter of sending tones on multiple audio frequencies at
the same time. This takes advantage of the narrow bandwidth of FT*
information.

Is it one signal or multiple?  We could easily make the argument that it is
one signal (being sent using SSB audio tones) that contains multiple
information components.

RTTY AFSK uses two tones (mark and space) to send information.  The two
tones are not on the exact same frequency.  Is that two signals or one?  It
has been considered as one signal forever.

I see a clear distinction, Randy. The two switched tones used to transmit RTTY constitute a single signal. When FT4 or FT8 software transmits more than one tone at a time, each is a separate signal.

The real problem with this practice is that considerable IM is generated. I've observed it on the signals from expeditions that were using it. It may be tolerable for F/H by a DXpedition when it's the only signal on the band, but would be a train wreck in almost any other application. W0YK made a post to this effect to the NCCC reflector a few days ago, noting that this was demonstrated in the recent webinar.

73, Jim K9YC


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>