CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest Multioperator Station Guidelines

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest Multioperator Station Guidelines
From: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: k9yc@arrl.net
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 13:26:59 -0700
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On 10/25/2020 7:23 PM, rjairam@gmail.com wrote:
By allowing them to stay at home and use the same call, but follow ALL
(every single one) of the existing M/M rules, they can still play.

This defies logic! Operators who have stations can "play" at home using their own calls, which gives other contesters more stations to work. I see that as a big plus! What am I missing? It's not the CALL of the contest station, it's the station, including it's antenna system, and its operators, that make it competitive.

I've operated at N6RO as part of M/M teams and as part of dozens of FD and county expedition teams for CQP and 7QP. The fun of doing so is the in-person camaraderie, learning from others, and, in the case of the expeditions, setting up and tearing down the stations, NONE of which happens under this rule change.

The N6RO team has spent the last six months reconfigured itself to operate M/M remotely. More of the true spirit of ham radio, station-building and learning new stuff to meet new challenges. FAR better than driving several hundred miles to box-top operate a station that someone else built!

73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>