Karlnet
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [Karlnet] Full Duplex KarlNet

To: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Full Duplex KarlNet
From: Pfactor <pfactor@swbell.net>
Reply-to: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 23:15:17 -0500
List-post: <mailto:karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Thinking out loud here, but wouldn't the ping fill test work sort of like a
denial of service attack?  Requesting that many responses from the AP I
would assume hurt the performance of the device in general. Now if you are
hitting a device on the other side it should not affect the AP.

A better test might be to start a ftp upload to a host one the far side
network and then start a ftp download at the same time.

Interested to see what you figure out on this.  This part caught my eye also
in reading the documentation.

Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com [mailto:karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com]On
Behalf Of Paul C. Diem
Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 10:07 PM
To: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
Subject: Re: [Karlnet] Full Duplex KarlNet


Exactly, which makes it full duplex since it does not have to share the
pipe between sending and receiving. The question is, why is the throughput
worse?

Paul C. Diem
PCDiem@FoxValley.net

On Wed, 8 May 2002, Terry Bomersbach wrote:

> This might be considered full duplex of sorts but it sounds more like load
> balancing.  Take outbound traffic on one pipe, inbound on the other pipe.
>
> It's not actually sending data out on both pipes, only sending responses
out
> on one pipe and receiving information on the other.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul C. Diem <PCDiem@foxvalley.net>
> To: karlnet@WISPNotes.com <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
> Date: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:23 PM
> Subject: [Karlnet] Full Duplex KarlNet
>
>
> >Has anyone ever configured an AP-1000 with KarlNet ISP Base to do full
> >duplex? According to the online help, you can set a backup interface and
> >check the Perm checkbox. This will make it send data over the backup
> >interface and receive data over the primary interface effectively making
a
> >full duplex link.
> >
> >I've tried setting it up this way on the base end (interface 2 is primary
> >on channel 1 and interface 3 is backup on channel 11) and the exact
> >opposite (interface 2 is backup on channel 1 and interface 3 is primary
on
> >channel 11). The ping fill test drops from about 7mbps to 2.5mbps.
> >
> >Is there something I'm missing?
> >
> >Paul C. Diem
> >PCDiem@FoxValley.net
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Karlnet mailing list
> >Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> >http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet

_______________________________________________
Karlnet mailing list
Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>