The ping fill shows a little over 4Mbps
4 errors, 3 lost or dropped. The test ran for 10 seconds.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Metcalf" <dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com>
To: <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 9:41 AM
Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Remote Statistics page
> Bob,
>
> I've noticed this too, that the bytes in on the 802.11b side is always
> higher than the user transmitted, maybe due to broadcasts and other "IP"
> packets (well at least if your bridged, but even when routed the 802.11b
> see's broadcast packets for its network)
>
> Whats the performance like on that link doing a ping fill test?
>
> We went from about 4Mbps to about 6Mbps w/ v4.27 on our ping fill tests
>
> Dan Metcalf
> Wireless Broadband Systems
> http://www.wbsysnet.com/
> 877-685-0578
> dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com [mailto:karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com]
> On
> > Behalf Of Bob Hrbek
> > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:16 AM
> > To: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > Subject: Re: [Karlnet] Remote Statistics page
> >
> > The SNR at the client is 43 and the SNR at the tower is 33. The guy
> is
> > only
> > about 1/2 from the tower with a 12dbi panel antenna.
> >
> > On the remote statistics page:
> > Bytes in: 1,987,965,131
> > Bytes out: 80,643,930
> > In errors: 3,067,386
> > in discards: 1,786
> > In FCS errors: 3,067,386
> >
> >
> > The guy is on a hill and the back side of his antenna faces a noise
> source
> > (about 6+ miles away though) but the panel has a pretty good front to
> back
> > ratio and I can't believe that would be causing much grief. I'm
> running
> > 3.88 on this soho and the AP. The device has been up for a little
> over 15
> > days. He has NOT transferred that much data as I monitor that stuff
> on my
> > firewall.
> >
> > -bob
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>
> > To: <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 7:04 AM
> > Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Remote Statistics page
> >
> >
> > > Bob,
> > >
> > > How long the unit has been up is not as important as how many total
> > packets
> > > it has passed.
> > >
> > > If FCS errors are MORE THAN 10% of total packets, you have a
> problem.
> > > Primary cause is usually poor RF. What is the signal/noise ratio
> and
> > signal
> > > strength of this unit?
> > >
> > > Kevin
> > > ____________________________________
> > > Kevin R. Knuth
> > > Business Development Manager
> > > North America
> > > Corporate Office: 614-822-5275 x130
> > > Home Office: 260-424-9690
> > > Cell Phone: 260-402-6086
> > > Email: kknuth@karlnet.com
> > > www.karlnet.com
> > > ____________________________________
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com
> [mailto:karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com]On
> > > Behalf Of Bob Hrbek
> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 8:25 PM
> > > To: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > > Subject: [Karlnet] Remote Statistics page
> > >
> > >
> > > Looking at the stats on a RG-1K configured as a Soho client. My in
> FCS
> > > errors are over 3million. There are other clients around this
> person
> > > (another one of those places where I see multiple soho's when doing
> a
> > link
> > > test from a soho) but this is the wost.
> > >
> > > What do most usually see for FCS errors on a client that has been up
> for
> > 3
> > > weeks?
> > >
> > > -bob
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.com>
> > > To: <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 4:35 PM
> > > Subject: [Karlnet] Re: more link test questions
> > >
> > >
> > > > I think I confused myself on that one....
> > > >
> > > > I should have cleared that up by stating that I'm connecting with
> the
> > SOHO
> > > > clients and they are showing adjacent SOHO clients in the "remote
> link
> > > > partner" window.
> > > >
> > > > -bob
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.com>
> > > > To: <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 3:53 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: more link test questions
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Here is my setup
> > > > >
> > > > > AP-1000 w/ ISP base
> > > > >
> > > > > RG-1000's w/ SOHO
> > > > >
> > > > > Why when I do a link test at a client why do I not
> only
> > get
> > > > the
> > > > > access point but adjacent clients? If I choose an adjacent
> client
> > it
> > > > looks
> > > > > as if the clients are actually communicating with each other.
> It is
> > > > > something I see all the time and would really like to know why
> they
> > come
> > > > up
> > > > > this way.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Bob Hrbek
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Karlnet mailing list
> > > > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > > > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Karlnet mailing list
> > > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Karlnet mailing list
> > > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Karlnet mailing list
> > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> > ---
> > [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
>
>
> ---
> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
>
|