I would run the PtMP on the WPBASE, we have found them to have much more
horsepower and work better with a decent number of clients than the AP1000's
----- Original Message -----
From: "Norm Young" <lists@applegatebroadband.net>
To: "Karlnet Mailing List" <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 10:43 AM
Subject: [Karlnet] SR-4200
> I have a need for four wireless interfaces at a WIPOP (expanding from the
> existing two). One is going to be used for PtP backhaul, two for PtMP,
and
> one for further expansion. I was considering using the flashrom and a MB,
> but it seems that only three wireless interfaces are possible in that
> configuration. So, I'm wondering if I can hook a WPBASE+ to the existing
> AP-1000, and perhaps run SR-4200 on it. Thus two wireless interfaces on
> the AP-1000, and two on the WPBASE+.
>
> Seems to me that SR-4200 supported two wireless interfaces (in addition
to
> an Ethernet port), but I'm not sure if this is true.
>
> I'm also wondering if it would be better to run SR-4200 on the existing
> AP-1000 and use the WPBASE+ for the PtMP using the base software. Which
> brings up the question, is it possible to shift the base license from the
> AP-1000 to a WPBASE+?
>
> Norm
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
>
|