On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 04:35:03 -0500
jna <jna@tcpbbs.net> wrote:
> I think basically what he meant and I have felt the same as well. That the
> pricing on the software does not reflect the hardware its being installed
> on. Why pay the same software costs to run half the hardware. I understand
> his point exactly, AP1000/KN-200 SAT being 200.00 and the AP has two slots
> for two potential SATS while the RG1XXX/KN-100 has one slot and one
> potential SAT yet the software costs the same.
not couting the crippiling of features on RG1XXX BASE firmware (why pay
US$350 to a BASE that will only run up to 8 clients while the AP1000 BASE
-- with two potential cells -- will run up to 32/48/64/128(?) clients
at the same price?)
> In all actuality it should
> not be unreasonable since you are only using 1/2 the software on a RG/KN-100
> the software price should reflect that and be half that of a license for a
> AP1000/KN-200 which used more of the software.
I could not said it better, thanks!
Cheers
!3runo
from Brazil
_______________________________________________
Karlnet mailing list
Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
|