Karlnet
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Karlnet] Getting Back In

To: "Karlnet Mailing List" <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Subject: Re: [Karlnet] Getting Back In
From: jna <jna@tcpbbs.net>
Reply-to: Karlnet Mailing List <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 15:37:49 -0500
List-post: <mailto:karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
> So the one in the middle, the KN-200, is in routing mode, with no IP's?
> Go to either RG on either end, set them to bridging mode - plug in your
> laptop to the Ethernet port and hit scan, you'll see the KN-200 in there.

The relay kn-200 which is the one in the middle it is in routing & bridging
mode. It does have ips assigned to it. It actually has 12.96.250.38 via a
direct route to interface 1 and as the prefered ip. The second route it a
direct route of 10.10.10.2 which was intended for the point to point back to
the RG at the data center this was assigned to interface 2 (secondary
ethernet) this was inteded for interface 4. I have one RG at the tower
connected to the kn-200 in bridge mode that RG is plugged into our switch at
the tower and I am linked into that via our wireless link and I still can
not see it. Do you actually have to do a crossover into the rg conected to
the kn-200 to see it?

> I'm not understanding... you say it's not PtP, but you said it was PtP
> before.  RG<->KN-200<->RG<---ethernet--->AP-1000, correct?
> So as I said, put the RG's and the KN in bridging mode, and then do the
> routing on the AP.

Yes and no. RG<->Kn-200 (This is PTP) on the first radio card the second
radio card is hooked into a horizontal omni and is feeding tower 1,2 etc and
each ap1000 on the towers are hooked in by an RG sat pointing back to the
second radio to the kn-200 so this is the PTMP portion.
<->RG<--ethernet-->AP-1000

Hope that is a little more clear? So I am into a link at one of the tower
via the ap1000 plugged into the same switch the that the RG (Bridged) that
is linked to the kn-200 is plugged into yet I can not see the kn-200
anymore.

This is where I am getting lost. But it is connected to everything I can
pull up all the border RG's connected to the intefaces of the kn-200 and see
the radio links back just fine.

Thanks,
John

> Regards,
> Jayson A. Baker
> Peak Internet Solutions
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com]
> On Behalf Of jna
> Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2003 1:18 PM
> To: Karlnet Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Karlnet] Getting Back In
>
> > Routing is routing is routing.  Whether you're using private IP's and
> > routing public over it, or just routing public - you're still routing.
>
> I understand that but I failed to assign the radio ports the any ips and
now
> I need to get into it remotely via a wireless link not the ethernet port
> that is why i was wondering how or if it is possible.
>
> > If you're only doing a point-to-point-to-point link I'd recommend using
> > bridging - there's no need to route... what else are you going to route
to
> > on a PtPtP link?  Go to the KN-200, connect via Ethernet and hit Scan -
> > you'll see what IP it has, put an IP in that same subnet in your machine
> and
> > set the unit to bridge.  Do the same for the RG's on either end.
>
> No its not just a PTP. Its a mix. We have the RG on the datacenter roof as
> the gateway from their wired network to our wireless network. I tried
having
> everything is bridging mode as it was before and without the cisco in the
> mix nothing worked as they were routing our ips to the radio on their roof
> and it did not know what to do with them. So I HAD to make it a router in
> order for it to know what to do with the traffic. Anyhow that part of the
> link to the relay point is point to point. From that point past the relay
> the links are PMP.
>
> Our network is not down as I had to switch back to our T1 because I do not
> have access to the ethernet ports on the kn-200 readly available. That is
> why I want to link to it via the radio ports and restore settings.
>
> > I would, however, recommend that you at least do routing in the AP-1000,
> or
> > with a router at the datacenter.  If your datacenter is like most,
you're
> > just plugged into a switch - not a good idea to bridge that to all your
> > users.  The best thing to do is put a two-port Ethernet router in the
> > datacenter, but that's up to you.
>
> Yeah its into a switch, I eventually am going to setup a Mikrotik box in
the
> datacenter as the gateway router but as a temporary measure I need a
router
> in the mix and need to use the current hardware in place to do this.
>
> Thanks,
> John
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
>
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
>

_______________________________________________
Karlnet mailing list
Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>