Karlnet
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Karlnet] Transfer Rates

To: Karlnet Mailing List <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Subject: Re: [Karlnet] Transfer Rates
From: Bryan <blsutton@airnetwifi.net>
Reply-to: Karlnet Mailing List <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 21:47:02 -0600
List-post: <mailto:karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Have you replaced your HOME link with laptop to see if it;s just the win98 Laptop?

jna wrote:



You have a 3MB link to the internet? Your testing from which type of PC
(xp, 98se?, linux, mac?) how are you testing the 1.2MB?



Yes we have a 3MB feed into the switch at the data center, the RG Sat is plugged into that switch and sending it over to the central relay. The test is done from my win98 laptop at the ethernet of the central relay and via a wireless link to the central relay both pull about 1.2MB but jumps from 800-1.2MB. Excellant connection to the backhaul though -47db signal -80'is noise floor.



Also RG1000's max out around 1.6Mbps (up & down)


Thats what karlnet said. But why is the configurator measuring the
connection from the RG to the KN at 3MB/S+? Replacing the RG with


another


KN
would increase this by what?


The 3Mb/s is a result of 1.5Mb + 1.5Mb, if you were graphing them in
real time you could see this, we use a Compaq utility which shows us in
realtime usage through our entire network



See this is the part I dont understand. My home link with the ping fill shows a connection to the towers ap1000 and registers around 1.5 -1.8MB on a ping fill. Yes so according to the above this connection should only do say 750K + 750K but it DOESNT I can register on any bandwidth test around 1.2+ - I am wondering how accurate the ping really is looking at the above.

John

_______________________________________________
Karlnet mailing list
Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet


_______________________________________________
Karlnet mailing list
Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>