To: | Karlnet Mailing List <karlnet@WISPNotes.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: [Karlnet] Bridge and route on the same KN200 |
From: | John Tully <tully@mikrotik.com> |
Reply-to: | Karlnet Mailing List <karlnet@WISPNotes.com> |
Date: | Wed, 28 Apr 2004 16:59:08 +0300 |
List-post: | <mailto:karlnet@WISPNotes.com> |
At 02:35 PM 4/28/2004, you wrote:
John, For 2.4GHz solutions, most people use our AP only and use some low cost client solution -- unless they need a very smart router at the client, and then they use our client solution also. For 5GHz, people use all MikroTik RouterOS products (and usually www.routerboard.com products) for a complete high speed solution. So, I don't think it would be so useful to have KN TC 2.4GHz client only support in our system. If the Linux driver includes source, then it wouldn't be difficult to add it -- but are many people interested in this? Also, we will have the so called 'polling' feature soon -- and from what I know about the Karlnet TC, ours will have some important features that are not in the TC. For example, ours will use multiple rates (actually, ours uses the best rate for throughput) -- where I have read that with some/all TC versions you have to set only one rate for the AP. Of course I am not an expert on TC, so I may be wrong. John -----Original Message----- From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] On Behalf Of John Tully Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 2:56 AM To: Karlnet Mailing List Subject: Re: [Karlnet] Bridge and route on the same KN200
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Karlnet] Bridge and route on the same KN200, bino-psn |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [Karlnet] Bridge and route on the same KN200, Dan Metcalf |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Karlnet] Bridge and route on the same KN200, bino-psn |
Next by Thread: | RE: [Karlnet] Bridge and route on the same KN200, Dan Metcalf |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |