To: | RTTY <rtty@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [RTTY] Distortion |
From: | Kok Chen <chen@mac.com> |
Date: | Tue, 24 Aug 2004 11:27:09 -0700 |
List-post: | <mailto:rtty@contesting.com> |
On Aug 24, 2004, at 9:35 AM, W0YR@aol.com wrote:So, an S9 FSK signal has no unwanted garbage (aside from key clicks). Unless your rig happens to be a "keyed FSK" rig, such as the FT-990, FT-1000D, FT-1000MP and many more. The keyed FSK signals go through the same balanced modulator path as AFSK does. So the same linearity rules apply to the stages following the balanced modulator as they do to AFSK. An S9 FSK signal STILL can be heard 2.125 kHz away at S2 to S3 !! That's Here is where AFSK can do better than FSK... FSK sidebands are pretty much controlled by the the rise and falls times of the modulating ("keying") signal. With AFSK, you have at least two controls. You can use continuous phase modulation to practically reduce the first order discontinuity to very small amounts. Secondly, you can apply a steep bandpass filter around the AFSK signal (I have no idea how many software modems actually do that, but I know of at least one that does) to reduce the modulation sidebands -- you can get modulating sidebands that are 300 Hz from the center frequency (600 Hz total bandwidth) to fall off to nothing. This AFSK "roofing" does not practically degrade the printability of the signal, as observed by people being able to print RTTY perfectly fine using 500 Hz and even 250 Hz receive filters. But it helps reduce your modulation sidebands (and allow you to apply that just little bit more of the transmit power to where it counts -- but don't tell any of the "QRO forever" guys :-). The bottom line of course is that the linearity of stages in the rig is very important when you are using AFSK whether or not you apply any of the AFSK cleanup countermeasures. BTW, the FCC has recently tightened the rules on spurii on commercial Amateur equipment. 40 dB now. 73 Chen, W7AY P.S. why don't we get on the air some weekend to do some signal comparison stuff? Perhaps a roundtable where people can play with ALC levels and see what others report. Everyone can benefit from hearing what well tuned and overdriven signals sound like. Especially when they discover that overdriven signals are actually harder to copy! _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [RTTY] Distortion, VE3XD |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Net? Re: [RTTY] Distortion, Peter Laws |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [RTTY] Distortion, Jerry Flanders |
Next by Thread: | Net? Re: [RTTY] Distortion, Peter Laws |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |